While this loss in quality may not be noticeable to the average user, it can pose problems for certain professionals (e.g. We should also note that a side effect of compression is often a loss in quality. Fortunately, there is a way to convert WebP images into a format that does play nice with others. This makes the WebP format a bit of a pain to work with. However, some programs simply fail to recognize the WebP format at all.

Some programs (like Photoshop) get around this incompatibility with third-party plugins. Many of the most common image manipulation tools like Adobe Photoshop do not natively recognize WebP. It’s safe to assume that everyone can agree a faster Internet is a better Internet, so what’s the issue? Criticisms of WebPĭespite being developed for roughly seven years, the WebP format doesn’t enjoy widespread support. Because of this, a lot of high traffic websites utilize the WebP format, as a faster loading site equates to a better user experience.

This results in websites that load faster and consume less bandwidth. This makes the file sizes of images on the web significantly smaller than JPEG or PNG.Īccording to Google, the WebP format reduces image file size anywhere from nineteen to sixty-four percent. In order to do this the WebP image format employs a more efficient compression algorithm. Google has been working on WebP for a number of years with a goal of reducing image file sizes without compromising quality.

Webp to jpg converter chrome extension